Stalking remains one of the most underreported crimes across the English-speaking world, yet it affects an estimated 4 percent of the British population annually—a figure researchers say mirrors patterns seen in North America, Australia, and Scandinavia. A new podcast series is attempting to change how we understand the psychology behind these crimes.
'Anatomy of a Stalker,' a five-part series from Crime+Investigation, launched this week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Amazon Music. Rather than sensationalizing individual cases, the production takes a clinical approach, mapping five distinct psychological profiles that researchers say account for the majority of stalking incidents worldwide.
Hosted by Ruchira Sharma—a freelance journalist with bylines in The Guardian, BBC, and VICE—the series draws on forensic psychology to decode obsessive behavior. The first episode, 'A Crime of Pattern,' introduces the five typologies that form the backbone of modern stalking research: the Rejected stalker, the Intimacy-Seeker, the Incompetent, the Resentful, and the Predatory type.
These categories emerged from clinical studies of institutionalized stalkers and have become standard frameworks in law enforcement training across multiple countries. The rejected stalker typically escalates contact after a relationship ends. The intimacy-seeker often exhibits delusional thinking, convinced their target secretly loves them despite clear rejection. The incompetent type lacks social skills and uses ineffective—sometimes darkly comedic—methods to pursue romantic interest. The resentful stalker seeks revenge for perceived humiliation. The predatory type, considered most dangerous, systematically stalks victims with calculated intent.
"What makes this series different is its refusal to treat stalking as a single phenomenon," explains Dr. Rachael Wheatley, the forensic psychologist guiding the investigation. Joining her are barrister Grace Rose Gwynne and clinical psychologist Dr. Alan Underwood, creating a multidisciplinary panel addressing victim impact, legal barriers, and rehabilitation possibilities.
The timing of the series reflects growing international concern about stalking's legal gray zones. In Denmark, where stalking cases have increased alongside digitalization, authorities have struggled with enforcement. Similar challenges plague North America: American prosecutors often categorize stalking under harassment or cybercrime statutes rather than as a distinct offense, complicating conviction rates. The UK introduced specific stalking legislation in 2012, yet convictions remain low relative to reported incidents.
